This week, both our winning comments on the insightful side come in response to Ajit Pai’s whining about California’s net neutrality effort — and, more specifically, in response to a commenter making the silly blanket statement that all regulation fails and governments cannot do anything right. In first place, ShadowNinja with some counterexamples:
Black and white statements like that are always wrong. There’s literally tons and tons of government programs that worked great and didn’t backfire in the long run. Here’s just a short list of what things I can think of off the top of my head that you can thank the government for, that you can’t say anything bad about how they backfired.
- Having safe food that’s not laced with poison or other things that will make you sick.
- Knowing that up to $250,000 worth of assets will the safe in the event of your bank going under thanks to FDIC insurance required by law.
- Not having rivers and oceans that literally catch on fire because of how polluted they are with harmful chemicals/etc. that businesses dumped in them (yes, this really happened in the US).
- Having much cleaner air because of the same environmental regulations, and not having air so polluted that people have to wear smog masks just to go outside, and some wealthy literally go on ‘clean air vacations’ where it’s less polluted (this is the reality today in China in a number of cities thanks to lack of regulation).
- Knowing that any car you purchase has passed rigorous government safety inspections when it was designed, and any used car you purchased was inspected as well to make sure that it’s still safe to drive. Such regulations are responsible for a consistent decline in automobile accidents (which has long been the #1 killer in America).
I bought a gallon of milk in the grocery store last week, and I actually got a measured gallon of the listed substance for the posted price. It also didn’t make me ill when I consumed it.
I’d wager that the government does thousands of things right in your life, it’s just transparent when it’s running smoothly.
He know what the truth is, it just won’t fit in his mouth.
“Of course, those who demand greater government control of the Internet haven’t given up.”
Pai’s disingenuous characterization is not very subtle. In fact the demand is not for government control of the Internet, but for control over internet providers, no matter what flavor.
Control to keep the expected dumb pipes dumb. Control to encourage actual competition to keep quality high and prices low.
Control to keep those offering service honest in their advertising and billing practices.
Control to separate content from access.
Control to keep corporations from overly influencing Government in their favor rather than the owners of this country, the people.
And also weird how the ISP is putting the pressure on the website. It’s almost as if there should be some law to limit intermediary liability…
Over on the funny side, our first place winner comes after we clarified what happened with the Apple movie “deletion” kerfuffle, which turned out to be about dumb regional copyright restrictions. One commenter feared they might have to give back an earlier “most insightful” award for a comment on the subject, so Anonymous Anonymous Coward checked the criteria:
Did you move to another country?
In second place, it’s one more response to the Ajit Pai post, this time from Chip in full parody mode targeting a particular commenter:
I “told” you that This would “happen”! Idiots! Sycophants! MINIONS!
I “told” you that when there were REGULATIONS, that “meant” that SOMEDAY there would be Elections, and other “people” might get “elected” and Undo the REGULATIONS. You did not Praise me for my BRILLIANCE in “understanding that Elections “exist” and sometimes different Parties get Elected, which doesn’t matter anyway because oth Parties are the “same”, as you would know if you were Interested in Truth and in “history” such as GEORGE WASHINGTON’S FAREWELL ADDRESS, which is one of Many historical Things that I have read because I am very “very” Smart.
The “regulations” in California are BAD, and the FCC’s repeal of the REGULATIONS from Wheeler is also BAD, and Wheeler’s regulations were “also” BAD. That is OBVIOUS to anyone who is very VERY “smart” like “me”. Don’t you Sycophantic “idiots” Get it? Someay in California there will be an ELECTION. And different PEOPLE might get “elected”. And those different “people” might repeal this “law”. You’re all so Stupid! Stupid! for not recognizing my obvious GENIOUS in understanding that sometimes different “people” get Elected to things. You did not learn about History like I learne about History, at Smilin’ Jim’s Unaccredited Forth Grade Academy.
Every Nation eats the Paint chips it Deseves!
For editor’s choice on the funny side, we start out with another comment from Gary, this time in response to the Hollywood Chamber of Commerce engaging in some trademark bullying over the Hollywood sign:
Hey isn’t Hollywood that obscure California city that all those film studios moved to in order to escape draconian patent lawsuits from Edison?
And finally, it’s an anonymous comment about Tanzania’s plan to outlaw the fact-checking of government statistics:
Statistics show that 100% of leaders who demonize fact-checking are honest and deserve to be reelected.
That’s all for this week, folks!